AGENDA
PALM BEACH COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING
Amendment Round 12-1
Adoption & Amendment Round 12-2 Transmittal
MONDAY, JULY 23, 2012
9:30 a.m. 6th
Floor
Jane M. Thomson
Memorial Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
B. Opening Prayer and Pledge of Allegiance
C. Proof of Publication
MOTION: To receive and file proof of publication
2. PUBLIC
HEARING – Amendment Round 12-1 Adoption (Page 2 - 9)
3. PUBLIC
HEARING – Amendment Round 12-2 Transmittal (Page 10 – 12)
4. WORKSHOP
– Urban / Suburban Tier (Page 13)
5. COMMENTS
BY PLANNING DIRECTOR
(Page 13)
A. Amendment
Round 13-1 Initiation
6. ADJOURNMENT (Page 14)
2. PUBLIC
HEARING - AMENDMENT ROUND 12-1 ADOPTION
The Department of Economic Opportunity issued
a letter May 4, 2012 stating there were no objections or comments, and there
were no objections or comments from the State required Review Agencies.
2.A. Proposed Ag Reserve Related Text Amendments
|
Name |
Description |
|
This
proposed amendment would revise the Future Land Use Element to allow packing
plants within Agricultural Reserve Planned Development District (AgR-PDD)
preserves subject to specific criteria. |
|
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 5-4 vote at the Feb. 24th
Hearing. The Commission discussed whether there is a compelling need in
the future for packing plants, especially in PUD preserves. Ken Lassiter,
representing COBWRA, spoke in opposition and one member of the public spoke
in support. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Abrams, seconded by Comm. Taylor,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. The Board discussed the
importance of maintaining a balance between allowing accessory uses to
support agriculture while ensuring the intent of preservation and the bond
issue approved by the voters to preserve agriculture is maintained. One Commissioner suggested that the
additional criteria be considered prior to adoption. Three members of the public spoke regarding
all three AGR items; two spoke in opposition and one, the president of
COBWRA, spoke in support. One additional speaker spoke in opposition to
allowing heavy industrial type, value added packing plants such as canneries. |
|
|
Changes Since
Transmittal: Subsequent to
transmittal, the word ‘figure’ was revised to ‘map’ to accurately reflect the
Functional Classification of Road Map TE 3.1 as shown in Exhibit 1 in double
underline, double strike out. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan for the Ag Reserve
Packing Plant Amendment. |
Name |
Description |
|
|
This
proposed amendment would revise the Future Land Use Element to allow medical
related uses within an Institutional and Public Facilities future land use
designation on a site surrounded by the Bethesda West Hospital located in the
Agricultural Reserve Tier. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 9-0 vote at the Feb. 24th
Hearing. There was minimal Board discussion. COBWRA spoke in support. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Taylor, seconded by Comm. Abrams,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal Board
discussion. Three members of the public
spoke regarding all three AGR items on the agenda. Two spoke in opposition to this amendment
and one, the president of COBWRA, spoke in support. |
|
|
Changes Since
Transmittal: The first and second bullets of the new text have been combined to
clearly indicate that this provision applies only to the subject site. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan for the Ag Reserve
Institutional Medical amendment. |
2.B. Proposed Ag Reserve Related FLUA Amendments
|
Name |
Description |
|
|
Current: Proposed: Size: Location: |
Special
Agriculture (SA) and Agricultural Reserve (AGR) Institutional
& Public Facilities, with alternative SA and AGR (INST/SA and INST/AGR) 4.88
acres North
side of Boynton Beach Blvd, approx. 800 ft. east of SR7 |
|
|
Staff Recommendation: Adopt |
||
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 9-0 vote at the Feb. 24th
Hearing. The Commission discussed the alternative SA and AGR FLU
following COBWRA’s request that these alternative FLUs be removed. The County Attorney stated that the removal
of the SA and AGR would make the existing uses on site non-conforming. Mr. Lassiter of COBWRA spoke in support of
the proposed INST FLU, but against the retention of the alternative FLUs. |
||
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Abrams, seconded by Comm. Taylor,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal Board
discussion. Three members of the public
spoke regarding all three AGR items on the agenda. Two spoke in expressing concern regarding
this amendment and one, the president of COBWRA, spoke in support of this
amendment, but that if the property ownership changed, that the use should be
converted to medical related uses. |
||
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Future Land Use Atlas for the Ag Reserve
Boynton Beach Institutional amendment (LGA 2012-002). |
|
2.C. Proposed
County Initiated Corrective FLUA Amendment
|
Name |
Description |
|
|
Current: Proposed: Size: Location: |
Medium
Residential, 5 units per acre (MR-5) Institutional
& Public Facilities, with an underlying 12 units per acre (INST/12) with
a condition to limit the use to a CLF/nursing home 10.68
acres South
of South Drive and Lake Erie Drive, north Lantana Road |
|
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
||
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 10-0 vote at the Feb. 10th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
||
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Marcus, seconded by Comm. Aaronson,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. One Comm. inquired whether
the re-design of the site would be before the Board as part of the Zoning
process, and staff stated that it would return but an application had not
been submitted. There was no public comment. |
||
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Future Land Use Atlas for the Finnish
American Rest Home amendment (LGA 2012-005). |
|
2.D. Proposed Text and Map Series
Amendments
|
Name |
Description |
|
|
This
proposed amendment would revise the Future Land Use Element to add an
exception from the requirement to use Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) to
increase density for projects that propose density up to, but not exceeding,
density proposed by the master plan of a neighborhood plan formally received
by the BCC. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 12-0 vote at the Feb. 10th
Hearing. The motion added language to require that referenced
neighborhood plans are prepared in accordance with FLUE Objective 4.1,
Community and Neighborhood Planning.
There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Abrams, seconded by Aaronson, passed
in a 4-2 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing with Comm. Taylor and Burdick dissenting. A substitute motion for denial by Comm.
Burdick, seconded by Comm. Taylor, failed 3-3. The Board discussed whether this amendment
was necessary since the West Lake Worth Road Neighborhood Plan Area could be
grandfathered in, and that this amendment could allow areas to establish a
plan that could by-pass TDRs and Workforce Housing. Two members of the public spoke against
TDRs. The Housing Leadership Council
spoke in opposition citing the potential ability for projects to by-pass
requirements. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan for the Transfer of
Development Rights amendment. |
|
Name |
Description |
|
Introduction and Admin. Element
Updates |
This
proposed amendment will revise the Introduction & Administration Element
to: ·
Reflect recent 2011 legislation by adding
an additional planning timeframe, updating Evaluation and Appraisal
procedures, and modifying amendment procedures to allow large scale
amendments to be accepted more than twice per year if approved by the
BCC, ·
Eliminate redundant and/or outdated text
and definitions, and ·
Delete the abbreviations and acronyms
section. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in an 11-0 vote at the March 9th Hearing. There was minimal discussion. Two members of the public spoke in support
of the removal of the Acronym Section and against the removal of the twice
per year large scale amendment round limitation. |
|
|
BCC
Action: Transmit as modified, motion by Comm. Aaronson, seconded by Comm. Marcus,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. The motion included the
addition of language to require a super-majority (5-2) vote for the Board to
add intake dates for large scale amendment rounds (see Exhibit 1), stemming
from Board discussion on how to place criteria or limitations on adding
amendment rounds above the standard two rounds per year. Three members of the public spoke against
the removal of the twice per year large scale amendment round limitation, one
of which also recommended establishing a Rule 9J-5 based planning guide for
the County. |
|
|
|
This proposed
amendment would revise and update the following maps in the Comprehensive
Plan Map Series: ·
Coastal Resources Map, CM 1.1, to update the
information presented based on the most readily available data, and ·
Special Planning Areas Map, LU 3.1, to depict the West
Lake Worth Road Neighborhood Plan. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 12-0 vote at the Feb. 10th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Marcus, seconded by Comm. Aaronson,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion
and no public comment. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt an ordinance amending the
Comprehensive Plan for the Introduction and Administration Element and Map
Series amendments. |
|
Name |
Description |
|
Fire Rescue Services Element Updates |
The
proposed amendment, requested by the Fire Rescue Department, were coordinated
to make general updates to: ·
Revise the Fire Rescue Services Element to update the
Purpose and Existing Conditions section to reflect 2011 conditions with
regard to intergovernmental cooperation, funding, staffing and service
population, ·
Add a definition for ‘Quint’ to the Introduction and Element
(I&A), and ·
Update the Existing & Future Fire Station
Locations Map, FR 1.1. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 12-0 vote at the Feb. 10th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Aaronson, seconded by Comm. Taylor,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion
and no public comment. |
|
|
Changes Since
Transmittal: The transmitted version proposed the relocation of definitions from the I&A Element to the Fire-Rescue Element. Those changes are no longer proposed and
have been removed from this amendment. |
|
|
Library Services Element Updates |
This proposed
amendment would make general updates to: ·
Revise the Library Services Element to adjust levels of
service, update dates and timeframes that have expired, ·
Revise the Introduction & Administration Element to
delete definitions being added to the Library Services Element, and ·
Update the Palm Beach County Library System Map LS 1.1
in the Map Series. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 12-0 vote at the Feb. 10th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Aaronson, seconded by Comm. Marcus,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion
and no public comment. |
|
|
Changes Since
Transmittal: The transmitted version proposed the relocation of definitions from the I&A Element to the Library Element. Those changes are no longer proposed and
have been removed from this amendment. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt an ordinance amending the
Comprehensive Plan for the Fire-Rescue Services and Library Services Update
amendments. |
|
Name |
Description |
|
Recreation and Open Space Element Updates |
This proposed
amendment would revise the Recreation & Open Space Element to make
general updates and to: ·
Revise the level of
service for regional, district, and beach parks, ·
Delete the Active and Passive Recreation Facility
Tables and data from the Element, to be maintained in supporting
documents, ·
Update Existing Conditions Palm Beach County
Parks 1995 Map RO 1.1, and Future Conditions Palm Beach County Parks
(1996-2015) Map RO 2.1, and ·
Revise the Introduction & Administration Element to
modify definitions pertaining to Community and District Parks. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 12-0 vote at the Feb. 10th
Hearing. The Commission discussed the proposed decrease in Level of
Service and the figures in Table 1.2-1.
No members of the public spoke on the item. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Aaronson, seconded by Comm. Marcus,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal
discussion. Two members of the public spoke
against changing the park level of service.
Tim Granowitz, Parks Principal Planner, responded by stating that economic conditions contributed to the
change. |
|
|
Changes Since
Transmittal: The transmitted report proposed to update and relocate text from one
area of the Introduction to another, but did not appropriately reflect the
proposed change with underline and strike out. This has been corrected. |
|
|
|
This proposed amendment will revise the Conservation
Element to make general updates, including removing outdated requirements and
making minor revisions to correct typographical errors. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 12-0 vote at the Feb. 10th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
Changes Since
Transmittal: The transmitted report inadvertently omitted the deletion of a
reference to the repealed Rule 9J-5.
This has been corrected. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion
by Commissioner Marcus seconded by Commissioner Aaronson passed in a
unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal Board
discussion. One member of public the
commented on items unrelated to the amendment. |
|
Intergov. Coordination Element Updates |
This proposed
amendment would update the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to remove
references of the Multi-Jurisdictional Issues Forum. Additionally, policy numbers referring to
other elements would be updated to reflect the correct Objectives and
Policies within each element. |
|
Staff Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 12-0 vote at the Feb. 10th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Marcus, seconded by Comm. Aaronson,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal
discussion. One member of the public spoke
regarding coordination with the SFWMD. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt an ordinance amending the
Comprehensive Plan for Agenda Items # through 2.D.6 through 2.D.8. |
2.E. Proposed Transportation Related Amendments
|
Name |
Description |
|
|
The proposed amendments will revise the Transportation Element to make
general updates and to delete obsolete references for consistency with
changes to the Florida Statutes and the eliminated Chapter 9J-5 of the
Florida Admin. Code. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval as modified at the hearing, passed in a 12-0
vote at the Feb. 10th Hearing. The motion included the
deletion of Policy 1.9-c (interconnectivity) and adding “Planning Commission”
to Policy 1.14-b. The Commission discussed Policy 1.9-c, expressing concern
that interconnectivity between certain uses may be compromised by the new
wording. Bill Cross from the Zoning
Division stated that interconnectivity requirements have been added to the
ULDC with connectivity being required as appropriate. The Commission determined that the policy
had been implemented and was no longer necessary. There was no public comment. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit
as recommended by the LPA, motion by Comm.
Marcus, seconded by Comm. Aaronson, passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with
Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th Hearing. There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan for Transportation
Element Updates amendment. |
|
2.E.2 |
This proposed amendment would clarify the description of the boundaries
of the Coastal Residential Exception Area.
|
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 9-0 vote at the Feb. 24th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit
as modified, motion by Comm. Aaronson, seconded by Comm.
Marcus, passed in a 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. The motion included changes
presented by staff at the hearing to clarify the boundaries of the CREA
(shown in double underline/double strike out in Exhibit 1). There was minimal discussion and no public comment. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan for the Coastal
Residential Exception Area amendment. |
|
|
The
proposed amendment will revise the Transportation Element to modify the City
of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) Transportation
Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) in order to reflect changes in
circumstances and the expiration of some dates. The changes involve implementation of the
following measures: ·
Revise a provision of the City of Riviera
Beach Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) that requires a Transit Circulator
Service by the year 2007, ·
Delete requirement for the CRA to acquire a
rail station site from the year 2010 to a more realistic time frame when the
site is actually needed, and ·
Eliminate
a requirement to improve the intersection at Blue Heron Blvd/US1. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 8-0
vote at the Feb. 24th Hearing. Staff presented a letter from
the City of Riviera Beach in support of the amendment (see Exhibit 3). The Commission discussed the FEC corridor
study and expressed operational concerns over the current intersection of
Blue Heron Boulevard and US1. Scott
Evans of the Riviera Beach CRA responded that FDOT will be making
intersection improvements in the future.
|
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit as modified, motion by Comm. Abrams, seconded by Comm. Marcus,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. The motion included changes
presented by staff at the hearing (shown in double underline/double strike
out in Exhibit 1). There was minimal
discussion. One member of the public spoke
in opposition to increasing densities in the Coastal High Hazard Area, a
subject that was unrelated to this proposed amendment. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan for Riviera Beach CRA
TCEA amendment. |
|
Westgate/ Belvedere Homes CRA TCEA |
This
proposed amendment would modify the Transportation Element to revise a
provision for the Westgate-Belvedere Homes Community Redevelopment Area (CRA)
Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) that requires a Transit
Circulator Service by 2010. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Adopt |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 8-0
vote at the Feb. 24th Hearing. There was minimal discussion
and no public comment. |
|
|
BCC Action: Transmit, motion by Comm. Marcus, seconded by Comm. Abrams,
passed in a unanimous 6-0 vote (with Comm. Santamaria absent) at the March 28th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion
and no public comment. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To adopt
an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan for the Westgate /
Belvedere Homes CRA TCEA amendment. |
3. PUBLIC
HEARING - AMENDMENT ROUND 12-2 TRANSMITTAL
Transmitted
amendments will be forwarded to the reviewing agencies under the Expedited State
Review Process.
3.A. Proposed Text and Map Series Amendments
|
Name |
Description |
|
Historic Preservation Element Updates |
This
proposed amendment would revise the Historic Preservation Element and the
Introduction & Administration Element in order to make general updates
and to: ·
Revise the Introduction of the Historic Preservation
Element to explain the role of cultural resources, their relevance to Palm
Beach County, and the economic benefit they provide, ·
Revise the description historic preservation &
archaeology functions to reflect current practices, ·
Propose new Objectives and Policies reflecting the many
tasks and ongoing roles already performed by the County as recommended by the
Historic Resources Review Board at its March 7 and May 17, 2012 meetings, ·
Add the names of historic sites and districts
designated by the BCC since August 1999 as depicted on Map Series Map HP 1.1,
and ·
Revise the definition of Cultural Resources in the
Introduction & Administration Element. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Approve - Transmit |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 7-0 vote at the June 8th
Hearing. The Commission asked several questions of Planning staff
regarding applicability in municipalities and heritage tourism. No members of the public spoke on the
item. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To transmit
the Historic Preservation Element Updates amendment. |
|
|
This proposed
amendment will modify the Future Land Use Atlas Regulations to exempt a 64.48
acre parcel of land from the development restrictions established for the
Commercial Low future land use (FLU) designation, and consequently from the
single tenant limitation set forth in the Unified Land Development Code
(ULDC). |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Approve - Transmit |
|
|
LPA Recommendation: Denial passed in a 5-2
vote at the June 8th Hearing. The LPA discussed the presence
of existing big box commercial within a few miles of the site and expressed
concern regarding: setting a precedent that other properties may rely on,
that this site had been amended multiple times, that multiple big box stores
could develop on the site, and questioned the consistency with Rural Tier Policy
1.4-a regarding compatibility with the scale, mass, intensity of use, height,
and character of the community. Two
representatives of the Sluggett property spoke in support. One member of the
public spoke in support. The two
members of the public spoke in opposition, including a representative from
Fox Trail. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To transmit
the Commercial Low Single Tenant amendment. |
3.B. Proposed County Initiated Future Land Use
Atlas Amendment
|
Name |
Description |
|
Hungryland Slough Natural Area
Addition |
Request: RR-10 to CON Size: 1,669.43 acres (approximately 1,264 parcels) Location: South of Bee-Line Highway, south and
east of the Pratt Whitney Rd. intersection with Bee-Line. Justification: This proposed
amendment will change the Future Land Use Designation for properties
purchased by the County’s Environmental Resources Management Department for
the Hungryland Slough Natural Area. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Approve - Transmit |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval passed in a 7-0 vote at the June 8th
Hearing. There was minimal discussion.
One member of the public asked a question about the removed
density. Staff responded that the
density being removed as a result of this amendment is being retired. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To transmit
the Hungryland Slough Natural Area amendment (LGA 2012-010). |
3.C. Proposed Transportation Related Amendments
|
Name |
Description |
|
Congress Avenue TIM and 2020 Map |
This
proposed amendment will modify the Future 2020 Roadway at Number of Lanes Map
for consistency with the Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) 2035 Cost Feasible Plan and to modify the Thoroughfare Right of Way
Identification Map (TIM) as follows: ·
Congress Avenue
Extension from Park Lane to the Richard Road/ Alternate A1A intersection, to
reduce the right of way from 80 feet to 66 feet on the TIM; and ·
Congress Avenue
Extension from Northlake Blvd to Alternate A1A, to reduce the number of lanes
from 4 to 2 lanes on the 2020 Number of Lanes Map. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Approve - Transmit |
|
|
LPA Recommendation: Approval passed in a 7-0
vote at the June 8th Hearing. There was minimal discussion
and no public comment. At the hearing, staff stated that the conceptual
alignment of the Congress Avenue Extension reflected in this report was
presented to the Board of County Commissioners on April 17, 2012, at which
time the BCC unanimously approved the conceptual alignment for this
roadway. Staff indicated that this
proposed amendment is consistent with that alignment, and the reduction in
ROW and number of lanes will further reduce the need for ROW acquisition
while providing for construction of 2/3 lanes roadway cross section that is
needed to serve future traffic demands.
|
|
|
MOTION: |
To transmit
the Congress Avenue TIM & 2020 Map amendment. |
|
|
This proposed
amendment will revise the Map Series and policies to reflect the latest
legislative requirements. The proposed
changes are described below. ·
To delete the following maps that are no longer
required: Future 2020 Roadway System and Major Parking Facilities Map TE 2.1,
Future 2020 Maintenance Responsibility Of Roads Map TE 4.1, Future 2020 Major
Public Transit Generators and Attractors Map TE 5.1, Future 2020 Bicycle
Facilities Map TE 10.1, Future 2020 Pedestrian Facilities Map TE 11.1, and
Future 2020 Transportation Facilities Critical To Coastal Evacuation Map
12.1; ·
To revise maps: Future 2020 Airport Locations Map TE
7.1, Future 2020 County Airport Clear Zones Map TE 8.1, and Future 2020 Other
Airport Clear Zones Map TE 9.1; ·
To revise references to the Bicycle Transportation Maps
and Plans in the Future Land Use and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Approve - Transmit |
|
|
LPA Recommendation: Approval passed in a 7-0
vote at the June 8th Hearing. There was minimal discussion
and no public comment. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To transmit
the Transportation Map Updates amendment. |
|
Wellington Medical Arts District CRALLS |
This proposed amendment will modify several provisions of Medical Arts
District (MAD) Constrained Roadway at Lower Level of Service (CRALLS) at the
request of City of Wellington and will modify the TCEA and CRALLS Map TE 15.1
to reflect these changes. |
|
Staff
Recommendation: Approve - Transmit |
|
|
LPA
Recommendation: Approval with
modifications as recommended by Staff in Exhibit 1-A passed in a 7-0 vote at the June 8th Hearing. The LPA recommended that staff continue to
work with Wellington staff to resolve issues regarding conditions number 8
(transportation coordinator related) and number 13 (prop share related). The LPA also discussed the additional
mitigation fee (in the amount of 0.5 times the impact fee). Representatives of three properties within
the MAD spoke in opposition to the mitigation fee requirement as they
considered it to be a disincentive to the development of the MAD. |
|
|
MOTION: |
To transmit
the Wellington MAD CRALLS amendment. |
4. WORKSHOP – Urban/Suburban Tier
Summary: This is the third of a series
of public workshops requested by the BCC to present the history and evolution
of guiding principles, objectives and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. This
workshop will summarize information regarding the history of the Urban/Suburban
(U/S) Tier, including the portion in the Glades Communities, and is intended to
provide context for discussion on policy issues and decisions regarding
existing and future land uses. Although
the Tier System applies only to unincorporated County, all but one of the
County’s 38 municipalities are located within the U/S
Tier.
5. COMMENTS BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
A. Amendment Round 13-1 Initiation
The purpose of initiation is for the Board to review
short summaries and to ‘initiate’ the amendments, authorizing staff to proceed
with their review and return with a staff report and recommendation for each
amendment at public hearings later in the year.
1. General
Amendments
Summary: These amendments have been
identified by County departments for initiation.
MOTION: To initiate the proposed
General Amendments.
2. Ag
Reserve Traditional Marketplace – Private Amendment Request
Summary: This
amendment has been requested by the agent for the Delray Marketplace
Traditional Marketplace (TMD) in the Ag Reserve. This amendment would add a provision to allow
Ag Reserve TMDs to transfer potential density to a separate project (AGR-PUD)
within the Ag Reserve.
MOTION: Not to initiate the proposed AgR-TMD amendment.
[Above item was withdrawn by applicant on
7/9/12]
6. ADJOURNMENT
Be
advised that anyone choosing to appeal any action with respect to any matter
discussed by the Board of County Commissioners will need a record of the
proceedings, and may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal
is based.
T:\Planning\AMEND\12-2\Reports-Agendas\2-BCCTran\1-Agenda
BCC Tran4.doc