|
|
| Palm Beach County Zoning Division is conducting a Survey of our Users of the Unified Land Development Code(ULDC). Staff is seeking your input in order to continue to seek ways to improve substantive changes to the ULDC and improve the overall functionality of the Interactive Code.
Your responses to the survey questions will assist us in reaching this goal. Staff will post the results of the Survey on our Web Page. Thank you in advance for taking the survey. -Jon MacGillis, Zoning Director |
|
User Information |
| 1. |
Select your organization type. |
| |
Agent |
| |
Developer |
| |
Resident |
| |
Goverment Employee |
| |
Other |
| 2. |
State your position/title. |
| |
|
| 3. |
Select your role in that organization. |
| |
Developer |
| |
Owner |
| |
Architect |
| |
Technician |
| |
Goverment Employee |
| |
Other |
| 4. |
State how long you have made use of the Interactive Code. |
| |
One Year |
| |
Less than 1 year |
| |
Less than 6 months |
| |
Less than 3 months |
| |
One month |
| 5. |
Select the capacity in which you have used the Interactive Code. |
| |
Advisory Board Member |
| |
Decision Maker |
| |
Applicant |
| |
Government Employee |
| |
Public |
| |
Agent |
| |
Other |
| 6. |
Select the provisions of the code or features that you have used. (Select as many as applicable) |
| |
Use Charts |
| |
Performance Standards (noise, storage, landscaping, etc.) |
| |
Nonconforming Provisions (Art.1) |
| |
Prior Approvals (Art. 1) |
| |
Eminent Domain (Art. 1) |
| |
Development Review Procedures (Art. 2) |
| |
Pubilc Hearing, Variances (Art. 2) |
| |
DRO, Administrative Variance, Monitoring, Concurrency (Art. 2) |
| |
Use Matrix's and notes (Art. 3 and Art. 4) |
| |
Performance Standards (noise, storage, landscaping, etc.) (Art. 3) |
| |
Overlay and Standard Zoning Districts (Art. 3) |
| |
PDD, TDD (Art. 3) |
| |
Property Development Regulations (FAR, Setbacks Ht., etc.) (Art. 3) |
| |
Communication Tower, Excavations (Art. 4) |
| |
Supplementary Standards (Art. 5) |
| |
Parking/Loading (Art. 6) |
| |
Landscaping (Art. 7) |
| |
Signage (Art. 8) |
| |
Archaeological (Art. 9) |
| |
Enforcement (Art. 10) |
| |
Other Regulations (platting, subdivision) (Art. 11) |
| |
Traffic Performance Standards (Art. 12) |
| |
Impact Fees (Art. 13) |
| |
Environmental (Art. 14) |
| |
Health Regulations (Art. 15) |
| |
Airport Regulations (Art. 16) |
| |
Decision Making Bodies (Art. 17) |
| |
Flood Damage Prevention (Art. 18) |
| |
Other Physical Characteristic Regulations |
| |
Frequently Asked Questions |
| |
Prior Ordinances |
| |
Illustrations |
| |
Videos |
| |
Bookmarks |
| |
PDF/Articles |
| 7. |
How often do you consult the Code. |
| |
Daily |
| |
Weekly |
| |
Monthly |
| |
Infrequently |
Adequacy of the Existing Code |
| 8. |
The current Zoning Code is successful in implementing the vision of the County's Comprehensive Plan. |
| |
Strongly Agree |
| |
Mostly Agree |
| |
Agree Somewhat |
| |
Strongly Disagree |
| |
Do Not Know |
| 9. |
The current Zoning Code is adaptable to site-specific conditions and changing industry standards while upholding basic objectives. |
| |
Strongly Agree |
| |
Mostly Agree |
| |
Agree Somewhat |
| |
Strongly Disagree |
| 10. |
The existing standards are clear enough to produce predictable results and reduce uncertainty for developers. |
| |
Strongly Agree |
| |
Mostly Agree |
| |
Agree Somewhat |
| |
Strongly Disagree |
| 11. |
The exiting code is easy to use and clearly understandable to those who use it most. |
| |
Strongly Agree |
| |
Mostly Agree |
| |
Agree Somewhat |
| |
Strongly Disagree |
| 12. |
How often do conflicts or misunderstandings arise from your use of the current code. |
| |
Frequently |
| |
Infrequently |
| |
Never |
| 13. |
Please list article sections of the Code that, in your experience, cause conflicts or misunderstandings most frequently and cite why for each. |
| |
|
| 14. |
If the existing process to amend the ULDC adequate, or response to industry changes, in your opinion. If no, can you recommend changes? |
| |
|
| 15. |
The current codes reflect an appropriate level of regulation by the County. |
| |
Strongly Agree |
| |
Mostly Agree |
| |
Agree Somewhat |
| |
Strongly Disagree |
| |
| Explain Response: (Please provide your comments in the box below) |
|
|
| 16. |
The time frame for development process is appropriate. |
| |
Strongly Agree |
| |
Mostly Agree |
| |
Agree Somewhat |
| |
Strongly Disagree |
| |
| Explain Response: (Please provide your comments in the box below) |
|
|
| |
| Please list any suggestions you may have for expediting the development process and/or removing uncertainties: |
|
|
Recommendations for modifications to the Code |
| 17. |
Other comments regarding the current Zoning Code (e.g. strengths, weakness, areas in which you would like to see improvement.) |
| |
|
| 18. |
If you have used any other Zoning Codes, which one have you found the most user-friendly? What do you like about the Interactive Code? |
| |
|